Repository of Research and Investigative Information

Repository of Research and Investigative Information

Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences

Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patients with right bundle branch block with and without coexistent left-sided conduction defects

(2008) Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patients with right bundle branch block with and without coexistent left-sided conduction defects. Europace. pp. 566-571. ISSN 1099-5129

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?F...

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to assess the significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure (HF) patients considered eligible for cardiac resynchronization. Methods and results A total of 200 consecutive HF patients (158 males, mean age 56 +/- 13.5 years) with standard indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were evaluated prospectively. The prevalence of an interventricular mechanical delay >= 40 ms was lower in patients with pure right bundle branch block (RBBB) than that in those with RBBB plus left fascicular hemiblock (RBBB-LFH) and those with left bundle branch block (LBBB) (33 vs. 50 vs. 54, P = 0.05). A maximal difference in peak myocardial systolic velocity among all 12 segments (Ts)> 100 ms was found in 63 of the patients with LBBB, whereas it was present in 31 of the patients with pure RBBB and in 42 of those with RBBB-LFH (P < 0.001). A standard deviation of Ts (Ts-SD)> 34 ms was present in 58 of the LBBB subjects, but in only 29 and 42 of the patients with pure RBBB and RBBB-LFH, respectively (P < 0.001). Intraventricular dyssynchrony, however, was not different in patients with pure RBBB and in those with RBBB-LFH in terms of maximal difference in Ts (P = 0.25) and Ts-SD (P = 0.17). Conclusions Although LBBB was more often associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony, ECG sign of additional left ventricular (LV) conduction delay is not a helpful tool for the identification of intra-LV mechanical dyssynchrony in HF patients with RBBB who would benefit from CRT.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: congestive heart failure right bundle branch block left-sided conduction defect left bundle branch block electrocardiography colour tissue Doppler imaging therapy duration asynchrony delay cardiomyopathy defibrillator arrhythmias predictors care Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Divisions:
Page Range: pp. 566-571
Journal or Publication Title: Europace
Journal Index: ISI
Volume: 10
Number: 5
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun081
ISSN: 1099-5129
Depositing User: مهندس مهدی شریفی
URI: http://eprints.bmsu.ac.ir/id/eprint/7041

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item