(2020) Patients' preferences in selecting family physician in primary health centers: a qualitative-quantitative approach. BMC Family Practice. p. 11.
Text
Patients' preferences in selecting family physician in primary health centers a qualitative-quantitative approach.pdf Download (581kB) |
Abstract
Background The role of family physicians (FPs) in the metropolitan area is critical in identifying risk factors for disease prevention/control and health promotion in various age groups. Understanding patients' preferences and interests in choosing a FP can be an effective and fundamental step in the success of this program. In this study factors affecting the FP selection by Iranian patients referred to health centers in the most populous areas in the south of Tehran were assessed and ranked. Methods A sequential mixed-method (qualitative-quantitative) triangulation approach was designed with three subject groups of patients, physicians, and health officials. The Framework method was used to analyze interviews transcribed verbatim. After implementing an iterative thematic process, a 26-item quantitative questionnaire with high validity and reliability was drafted to evaluate the different factors. A convenient sampling method was used to select 400 subjects on a population-based scale to quantitatively rank the most critical selection factors as a mean score of items. Results The selection factors were divided into six centralized codes, including FPs' ethics, individual, professional and performance factors; patients' underlying disease and individual health, and disease-related factors, office's location and management factors, democracy factors, economic factors, and social factors. After filling out the questionnaires, the most important factors in selecting FP were a specialist degree in family medicine (FM) (4.49 +/- 0.70), performing accurate examinations with receiving a detailed medical history (4.43 +/- 0.68), and spending enough time to visit patients (4.28 +/- 0.75), respectively. However, the parameters such as being a fellow-citizen, being the same gender, and physician's appearance were of the least importance. Conclusion There is a possibility to screen the most important factors affecting the FP choice through the combination of qualitative and quantitative studies. The first and last patients' priority was physicians' specialty in FM and being a fellow-citizen with them, respectively. The clinical and administrative healthcare systems should schedule the entire implementation process to oversee the doctor's professional commitment and setting the visit times of FP.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Family physician Patient satisfaction Primary care Health seeking behavior Continuity of care care choice doctor communication determinants services iran General & Internal Medicine |
Page Range: | p. 11 |
Journal or Publication Title: | BMC Family Practice |
Journal Index: | ISI |
Volume: | 21 |
Number: | 1 |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01181-2 |
Depositing User: | مهندس مهدی شریفی |
URI: | http://eprints.bmsu.ac.ir/id/eprint/8760 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |