Abstract

Objective: To compared the accuracy of digital radiography in the diagnosis of interproximal caries in permanent teeth with conventional radiography and visual examination. Material and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 78 human premolars, which seem normal in primary examination, are mounted on the plaster in a pair-wise manner and their caries are visually evaluated. Conventional and digital radiographic images are taken under the same conditions and their caries are graded with Confidence Score. To determine the golden standard, after mesiodistal incision, the teeth are examined using stereomicroscopy. Finally, the results obtained by visual observation and conventional radiography as well as digital images were compared with those obtained from the stereomicroscopy to determine their accuracy in detecting the interproximal caries. Results: The consistencies between the visual, digital, and conventional methods with the standard method (microscopic histology) are 53, 78, and 50 respectively - all of them are significant (p<0.05). The highest and the lowest sensitivities are related to the digital (96) and visual (88) methods respectively, while the highest and lowest specificities are related to the digital (79) and conventional (50) methods respectively. The highest and lowest positive predictive value is related to the digital (79) and conventional (80) methods respectively. The highest and lowest negative predictive values are related to the digital (90) and visual (71) methods respectively. Compared with the standard methodology, the most accurate diagnostic accuracy can be seen for the digital method (91). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the diagnosis of interproximal caries by different methods, and the only advantage of digital radiography, compared with the conventional one, is storing radiographs without losing important information and the lower dose of radiation for the patient.