Repository of Research and Investigative Information

Repository of Research and Investigative Information

Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences

Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis

(2020) Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. pp. 109-122. ISSN 2229-5151 (Print) 2229-5151

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409125

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Restoring cardiopulmonary circulation with effective chest compression remains the cornerstone of resuscitation, yet real-time compressions may be suboptimal. This project aims to determine whether in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA; population), chest compressions performed with free-standing audiovisual feedback (AVF) device as compared to standard manual chest compression (comparison) results in improved outcomes, including the sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge (outcomes). METHODS: Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included that enrolled adults (age ≥ 18 years) with IHCA and assessed real-time chest compressions delivered with either the standard manual technique or with AVF from a freestanding device not linked to an automated external defibrillator (AED) or automated compressor. RESULTS: Four clinical trials met inclusion criteria and were included. No ongoing trials were identified. One RCT assessed the Ambu CardioPump (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD, USA), whereas three assessed Cardio First Angel™ (Inotech, Nubberg, Germany). No clinical RCTs compared AVF devices head-to-head. Three RCTs were multi-center. Sustained ROSC (4 studies, n = 1064) was improved with AVF use (Relative risk RR 1.68, 95% confidence interval CI 1.39-2.04), as was survival to hospital discharge (2 studies, n = 922; RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.54-2.06) and survival to hospital discharge (3 studies, n = 984; RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.62-2.25). CONCLUSION: The moderate-quality evidence suggests that chest compressions performed using a non-AED free-standing AVF device during resuscitation for IHCA improves sustained ROSC and survival to ICU and hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020157536).

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation chest compression feedback in-hospital cardiac arrest medical device
Page Range: pp. 109-122
Journal or Publication Title: Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci
Journal Index: Pubmed
Volume: 10
Number: 3
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis₁₅₅₂₀
ISSN: 2229-5151 (Print) 2229-5151
Depositing User: مهندس مهدی شریفی
URI: http://eprints.bmsu.ac.ir/id/eprint/9113

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item